| Global Environment Facility (GEF) | Previous Page 7(7) |
3.6 |
Annex 3. Sample Format for a PDF-B Cover Page |
COVER PAGE INFORMATION
1. Country:
2. Focal Area:
3. Operational Programme:
4. Project Title:
5. Total Cost:
6. PDF Request:
7. In-kind contributions:
8. Requesting Agency:
9. Executing Agency:
Block: PDF Block B
10. Duration:
PROJECT STRUCTURE
11. Project objective:
12. Global significance:
13. Background:
14. Project description: including implementation arrangements
15. Description of proposed PDF activities
16. PDF Block B Outputs:
17. Eligibility
18. National level support
19. Justification
Global benefits
20. Timetable
21.Budget
Output
Activities
Estimated Cost: US$
3.7 |
Annex 4. Sample Format for a PDF-B Request (UNEP) |
Country:
Project Title:
Focal Area:
Requesting Agency:
Executing Agency:
Total Project Cost:
PDF Block B Funding Request:
PDF Co-Funding:
Block A Grant Awarded:
Background
Summary Project Objectives and Description
Description of PDF Activities
Eligibility
National Level Support
Outputs of the PDF
Special Features - Aspects of the analysis for particular attention
Items to be Financed
Cost Table
ITEM / Activity
GEF
GOVERNMENT
Total:
3.8 |
Annex 5. Sample Format for a Full-Project Project Brief |
Box 8. Sample UNDP Template for a Full-Project Project Brief
Country Ownership
a) Country Eligibility
State date of ratification of relevant convention, if applicable, and: "[Country] is eligible for technical assistance from UNDP.
b) Country Drivenness
Clear description of project's fit within:
National reports/communications to Conventions
National or sector development plans
Recommendations of appropriate regional intergovernmental meetings or agreements.
c) Endorsement
State: "The project has been endorsed by the GEF Operational Focal Point in a letter dated [insert date] - see Annex 2 B."
Program Policy Conformity
Program Designation Conformity
Describe how project objectives are consistent with Operational Program objectives or operational criteria.
Project Design
Describe:
Sector issues, root causes, threats, barriers, etc, affecting global environment [note: institutional and legal context included here and (for BD projects) explanation of global significance].
Project logical framework, including a consistent strategy, goals, objectives, outputs, inputs/activities, measurable performance indicators, risks and assumptions.
Detailed description of goals, objectives, outputs, and related assumptions, risks and performance indicators.
Brief description of proposed project activities, including an explanation how the activities would result in project outputs (in no more than 2 pages).
Global environmental benefits of project.
Incremental Cost Estimation based on the project logical framework.
Describe project outputs(and related activities and costs) that result in global environmental benefits
Describe project outputs (and related activities and costs) that result in joint global and national environmental benefits.
Describe project outputs (and related activities and costs) that result in national environmental benefits.
Describe the process used to jointly estimate incremental cost with in-country project partner.
Present the incremental cost estimate. If presented as a range, then a brief explanation of challenges and constraints and how these would be addressed by the time of CEO endorsement.
Sustainability (including financial sustainability)
Describe proposed approach, within and/or outside the project, to address factors that influence continuation of project benefits after completion of project implementation.
Replicability
Describe the proposed approach to knowledge transfer, if any (for e.g., dissemination of lessons, training workshops, information exchange, national and regional forum, etc) (could be within project description).
Stakeholder Involvement
Describe how stakeholders have been involved in project development.
Describe the approach for stakeholder involvement in further project development and implementation.
Monitoring Evaluation
Describe how the project design has incorporated lessons from similar projects in the past.
Describe approach for project ME system, based on the project logical framework, including the following elements:
Specification of indicators for objectives and outputs, including intermediate benchmarks, and means of measurement.
Outline organizational arrangement for implementing ME.
Indicative total cost of ME (maybe reflected in total project cost).
Detailed budget
Final organizational arrangements for implementing ME
Specification of indicators for project activities, including intermediate benchmarks, and means of measurement
Financing
Financing Plan
3 a i Finalize project cost, including:
Detailed costing by activity and sub-activity
Financial plan with timing of disbursements
3 a ii Finalize financing plan, including confirmation of commitments by co-financiers - provide supporting documentation.
Cost-effectiveness
Estimate cost effectiveness, if feasible.
Describe alternate project approaches considered and discarded.
Institutional Coordination Support
Core commitments Linkages
Describe how the proposed project is located within the IA's:
Country/regional/global/sector programs.
GEF activities with potential influence on the proposed project (design and implementation).
Consultation, Coordination and Collaboration between IAs, and IAs and EAs, if appropriate.
Describe how the proposed project relates to activities of other IAs (and relevant EAs) in the country/region.
Describe planned/agreed coordination, collaboration between IAs in project implementation.
5. Response to Reviews
a) Council
Respond to Council Comments at pipeline entry.
Respond to Council comments at work program inclusion.
b) Convention Secretariat
Respond to comments from Convention Secretariats
c) GEF Secretariat
Respond to comments from GEFSEC on draft project brief.
Respond to comments from GEFSEC at work program inclusion
d) Other IAs and relevant EAs
Respond to comments from other IAs, relevant EAs on draft project brief.
e) STAP
Respond to comments by STAP at work program inclusion
f) Review by expert from STAP Roster
Respond to review by expert from STAP roster.
Respond to review by expert from STAP roster at workprogram inclusion
Annexes
LogFrame Matrix
Endorsement Letter
STAP review
Response to STAP review
Public Participation Strategy
Response to GEFSEC and Council comments at work program inclusion.
| Global Environment Facility (GEF) | Previous Page 7(7) |